24 09, 2021

The African Union and its Reactions to Three Types of Coups in Guinea, Mali, and Chad

By |2021-09-24T18:10:15+00:00September 24th, 2021|Featured, Justice, Practice|1 Comment

Three different types of coups have occurred in Guinea, Mali, and Chad, and they are worth identifying. These are opportunistic, oligarchic, and sultanistic coups. Opportunistic in the case of Guinea, oligarchic in the case of Mali, and sultanistic in the case of Chad. All of the coups were staged as military takeovers of civilian government, but in different contexts.  

10 07, 2020

Collectivism & Consensus in a Post Covid-19 World

By |2020-11-20T18:54:43+00:00July 10th, 2020|Arts & Letters, Justice, Theory|0 Comments

Death is a great leveler and, a virus that strikes at individuals indiscriminately, a potent reminder of just how precarious life can be and why, much like the pioneers, it might be in humankind’s best interest to re-invest in a philosophy that acknowledges man’s ability to understand the real world around him. Ayn Rand’s maxim that “nature to be commanded, must be obeyed” seems particularly appropriate (9). The question is, do we have the courage and the humility to subject ourselves to the laws of nature and identity?

27 03, 2020

Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID): Pros and Cons

By |2020-04-03T17:25:40+00:00March 27th, 2020|Practice|1 Comment

I favor the pro-life position on the abortion issue, all the while realizing that many good and decent people disagree with me. Why do they disagree? It seems they are influenced by popular claims and arguments favoring the pro-choice view. I intend no disrespect to anyone in saying this, but I think that many popular claims and arguments favoring the choice for abortion consist of knots of illogic that should be untangled.

18 10, 2019

Jagmeet Singh, Abortion, and Illogic

By |2019-11-08T03:06:36+00:00October 18th, 2019|Practice|0 Comments

I favor the pro-life position on the abortion issue, all the while realizing that many good and decent people disagree with me. Why do they disagree? It seems they are influenced by popular claims and arguments favoring the pro-choice view. I intend no disrespect to anyone in saying this, but I think that many popular claims and arguments favoring the choice for abortion consist of knots of illogic that should be untangled.

23 08, 2019

Arguing Dialectically about Abortion

By |2019-08-23T18:49:36+00:00August 23rd, 2019|Practice, Theory|0 Comments

How do we talk about abortion? How do we make arguments about a topic that evokes such strong reactions? In opposing articles, Nathan Nobis and Kristina Grob and Hendrick van der Breggen, approach the issue dialectically. One approach is to think dialectically--to critically examine arguments pro or con, in order to uncover the assumptions and grounds they rest on, and develop new arguments that respond to the faults we find in our prior positions.

Go to Top